| Brain 
        cells control 3D cursorBy 
      Eric Smalley, 
      Technology Research News
 Researchers at Arizona State University 
        have developed a feedback system that lets monkeys use brain signals to 
        move a virtual ball within a computer-generated box, an advance that increases 
        the chances that scientists will be able to give disabled people neural 
        control of prosthetic limbs.
 
 The research also suggests that surgeons will eventually be able to rewire 
        bodies to give people control over paralyzed body parts.
 
 The feat is the latest in a string of advances that allow brains to directly 
        control electronics. Scientists have been planting electrodes in the brains 
        of animals to record electrical activity for decades, but they have only 
        recently been able to use these neural signals to control robots and computers.
 
 In 2000 researchers from Duke University, MIT and the State University 
        of New York Health Science Center tapped a monkey's brain signals to make 
        a remote robotic arm mimic the movements of the monkey's own arm. Earlier 
        this year, researchers at Brown University showed that the method could 
        allow monkeys to consciously control a computer cursor, and found that 
        one monkey learned to move the cursor without physically moving its arm.
 
 The Arizona State experiment goes beyond two-dimensional cursor control 
        to give a pair of rhesus macaque monkeys direct cognitive control of a 
        virtual ball in a three-dimensional space. The Arizona monkeys also showed 
        greater control over the ball than the Brown monkeys had over their cursors, 
        said Andrew Schwartz, a research professor of bioengineering at Arizona 
        State University. The ball control resembles "real biological movement," 
        he said.
 
 The key to the researchers' success is a feedback system between the monkeys' 
        neurons and the software algorithm used to translate brain signals into 
        computer signals.
 
 Each of the many billion neurons in a primate brain is connected to as 
        many as 10,000 other neurons. Learning occurs when the brain adapts to 
        different conditions by changing the patterns of signals neurons transmit 
        and receive.
 
 The researchers added their software to the learning loop, allowing it 
        to adapt along with the changing neural signals within a small portion 
        of a monkey's brain. "We are using a more sophisticated approach that 
        allows two-way learning to take place," said Schwartz. "The animal learns 
        to move the cursor using biofeedback to change the discharge patterns 
        of its neurons. Our decoding algorithm tracks these changes as they occur" 
        in order to make better predictions about the new neural patterns, he 
        said.
 
 The monkeys were able to move the ball using brain signals alone almost 
        as well as they were able to control it with arm movements, said Schwartz.
 
 To teach the monkeys this cognitive control, the researchers implanted 
        electrodes in the motor cortex region of their brains. Motor neurons coordinate 
        muscle activity. The researchers rewarded the monkeys for using arm movements 
        to move the ball to a particular spot, and recorded the neural activity. 
        They used this recording to calibrate the software that translates the 
        neural activity into the control signal for the computer.
 
 The researchers then restrained the monkeys' arms so that the monkeys 
        could not physically move their arms as they attempted to move the virtual 
        ball. At first the monkeys pushed against the restraints in the direction 
        they wanted the ball to move, but stopped straining as their performance 
        improved. Measurements of the monkeys' brain activity showed that eventually 
        the monkeys could control the ball without using the normal brain signal 
        patterns associated with muscle movements, indicating that the neurons 
        had adapted to a new circumstance, according to Schwartz.
 
 Both the Brown and Arizona State research teams were able to use a surprisingly 
        small number of neurons to generate a control signal. Monkeys have millions 
        of neurons in the motor cortex, but the Arizona State researchers used 
        the signals from less than two dozen motor neurons to generate the ball 
        control signal, according to Schwartz.
 
 Using so few neurons would not be practical for controlling a prosthetic 
        device, said Miguel Nicolelis, a professor of neurobiology and biomedical 
        engineering at Duke University, and the lead researcher on the robotic 
        arm project. "If you [were to] lose a couple of neurons your entire implant 
        [would] become useless," he said. "Much larger neuronal samples are needed" 
        to make an implant practical over time.
 
 Controlling a neuroprosthetic arm is also considerably more complicated 
        than moving a cursor in a three-dimensional space, said Nicolelis. "To 
        reproduce complex 3D hand and arm trajectories and to mimic the force 
        required to move objects with a prosthetic arm, hundreds of neurons would 
        be needed," he said.
 
 The Arizona State researchers' next step is to replace the virtual cursor 
        with a robot arm that will be used by a monkey to retrieve food while 
        its arms are restrained, said Schwartz.
 
 And over the next two or three years, "we would like to try these implants... 
        in human patients," said Schwartz. Such a neural bypass could be used 
        to give disabled people control over computer-driven prosthetic limbs. 
        The technique could also be combined with electrical signals that stimulate 
        muscle movement in order to let paralyzed people regain control of their 
        own limbs, said Schwartz.
 
 Schwartz's research colleagues were Dawn Taylor and Stephen Helms Tillery 
        of Arizona State University. They published the research in the June 7, 
        2002 issue of the journal Science. The research was funded by the National 
        Institutes of Health, the Whitaker Foundation, the Philanthropic Education 
        Organization and the U.S. Public Health Service.
 
 Timeline:   2-3 years
 Funding:   Government, Private
 TRN Categories:   Biotechnology; Human-Computer Interaction
 Story Type:   News
 Related Elements:  Technical paper, "Direct Cortical Control 
        of 3-D Neuroprosthetic Devices," Science, June 7, 2002
 
 
 
 
 Advertisements:
 
 
 
 | June 
      12/19, 2002
 
 Page 
      One
 
 Software guides museum-goers
 
 Scientists spin 
      thread from nanotubes
 
 Brain cells control 
      3D cursor
 
 Faster growth 
      heightens Web class divide
 
 One-way heat valve possible
 
 News:
 Research News Roundup
 Research Watch blog
 
 Features:
 View from the High Ground Q&A
 How It Works
 
 RSS Feeds:
 News
  | Blog  | Books  
 
   
 Ad links:
 Buy an ad link
 
 
 
         
          | Advertisements: 
 
 
 
 |   
          |  
 
 
 |  |  |